Los profesionales no siempre juegan minimax: evidencia de las ligas de fútbol de américa latina

  • Aquiles Antonio Arrieta Investigador Independiente
Palabras clave: Minimax, Equilibrio de Nash, Estrategias mixtas

Resumen

Este trabajo busca aportar evidencia empírica en favor del teorema del minimax a partir de los datos procedentes de los cobros de penales en los partidos de varias ligas de fútbol profesional de América Latina. En línea con la mayor parte de la literatura sobre el tema, los resultados obtenidos indican que las implicaciones de equilibrio del teorema no se cumplen a cabalidad. Particularmente, los jugadores parecen conectar sus elecciones actuales con las realizadas previamente por su rival. Estos hechos ponen de manifiesto que no solo la experiencia cuenta para jugar minimax en el plano real. El contexto y las habilidades cognitivas también son relevantes.

Citas

Andersen, E. B., 1973. Conditional inference and models for measuring (Vol. 5). Mentalhygiejnisk forlag.

Azar, O. & Bar-Eli, M., 2011. Do soccer players play the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium? Applied Economics, 43, 3591-3601.

Brown, J. & Rosenthal, R., 1990. Testing the Minimax Hypothesis: A Re-examination of O'Neill's Experiment. Econometrica, 58, 1065-1081.

Chamberlain, G., 1980. Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225-38.

Chiappori, P.-A., Levitt, S. & Groseclose, T., 2002. Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 1138-1151.

Choe, J., & Kim, J. S., 2018. Minimax after money-max: why major league baseball players do not follow optimal strategies. Applied Economics, 1-15.

Dohmen, T., & Sonnabend, H., 2018. Further field evidence for minimax play. Journal of Sports Economics, 19(3), 371-388.

Ericsson, K. & Lehmann, A., 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review Psychology, 47, 273–305.

Gibbons, J. & Chakraborti, S., 1992. Nonparametric statistical inference. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Helsen, W. & Starkes, J., 1999. Multidimensional approach to skilled perception and performance in sport. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 1–27.

Hoff, T., 2001. John von Neumann’s Conception of the Minimax Theorem: A Journey Through Different Mathematical Contexts. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 56, 39-68.

Hsu, S., Huang, C. & Tang, Ch., 2007. Minimax Play at Wimbledon: Comment. American Economic Review, 97(1), 517-523.

Kovash, K. & Levitt, S., 2009. Professionals do not play minimax: evidence from major league baseball and the national football league. NBER Working paper series. Working Paper 15347.

Levitt, S., List, J. & Reiley, D., 2010. What happens in the field stays in the field: exploring whether professionals play minimax in laboratory experiments. Econometrica, 78(4), 1413-1434.

Martin, C., Bhui, R., Bossaerts, P., Matsuzawa, T., & Camerer, C., 2013. Experienced chimpanzees behave more game-‐theoretically than humans in simple competitive interactions. Caltech, Mimeo: Pasadena.

McCabe, K., Mukherji, A. & Runkle, D., 2000. An experimental study of information and mixed strategy play in the three person matching pennies game. Economic Theory, 15, 421–462.

Miller, C., 1998. He Always Puts It to the Right. A Concise History Of the Penalty Kick (London: Víctor Gollanez, St Edmundsbury Press Ltd).

Mood, A., Graybill, F. & Boes, D., 1974. Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Moschini, G, 2004. Nash equilibrium in strictly competitive games: live play in soccer. Economics Letters, 85, 365-371.

Ochs, J., 1995. Games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria: an experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 202–217.

Okano, Y., 2013. Minimax play by teams. Games and Economic Behavior, 77, 168–180.

Okano, Y., 2016. Re-examination of team’s play in a mixed-strategy game experiment. Applied Economics Letters, 23(8), 601-604.

O'Neill, B., 1987. Nonmetric Test of the Minimax Theory of Two-Person Zerosum Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 84(7), 2106-2109.

Palacios-Huerta, I. & Volij, O., 2008. Experientia Docet: Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments. Econometrica, 76(1), 71-115.

Palacios-Huerta, I., 2003. Professionals Play Minimax. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 395-415.

Palacios-Huerta, I. (2015). Beautiful Game Theory. Princeton University Press.

Rapoport, A. & Boebel, R. B., 1992. Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis. Games and Economic Behavior, 4, 261-283.

Rulence-Pâques, P., Fruchart, E., Dru, V., & Mullet, E., 2005. Decision-making in soccer game: a developmental perspective. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 55, 131–136.

Spiliopoulos, L., 2018. Randomization and serial dependence in professional tennis matches: Do strategic considerations, player rankings and match characteristics matter? Judgment and Decision Making, 13(5), 413-427.

Van Essen, M. & Wooders, J., 2014. Blind stealing: Experience and expertise in a mixed-strategy poker experiment. Games and Economic Behavior, 91, 186-286.

Wagenaar, W. A., 1972. Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of literature. Psychological Bulletin, 77(2), 65-72.

Walker, M. & Wooders, J., 2001. Minimax Play at Wimbledon. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1521-1538.

Wooders, J., 2010. Does experience teach? professionals and minimax play in the lab. Econometrica, 78(3), 1143-1154.

Publicado
2020-06-19